Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD)

[wbmw]

Jerry, Re: If AMD wants to launch a successful product, then it has the obligation to create all of the infrastructure necessary to make it a success. It was unwise to depend upon so many outside vendors to do so much of the heavy lifting for Opteron (i.e. chipsets, motherboards, compilers, software content, etc.) that it puts the probablity of success in jeopardy.

Creating a new architecture does not come for free, and a "build it and they will come" attitude won't work to make AMD64 a success.

How can a company the size of AMD create the infrastructure necessary to ramp a new platform in a market they've never been successful in? The question is rhetorical, because the problem is that AMD's business acumen still involves going head to head with Intel, and as such, they are asking the industry to hold them to the same standards. This creates a paradox, since a company the size of AMD cannot be held to Intel's standards, simply because they don't have the resources to do what Intel does. The problem with AMD lies in its very fundamental business principles.