InvestorsHub Logo

Zorax

09/11/15 10:05 PM

#32322 RE: HGG #32321

No one has to prove anything to you. ntgl has no patents, no patents pending and no actual product in manufacture or any verified contracts have been published. There is no proof of a real company called nanosux gaming. It would be more difficult for you to prove that ntgl has a single patent at all. Not to mention that ntgl has to have gaming licenses which there are none filed anywhere.
Sorry, ntgl is as phony as ntek. That's because they are the same company. Same company, same people run both of them.
Same guy in prison runs both of them from behind bars.

Meow D itchy Kitty

09/12/15 12:08 AM

#32325 RE: HGG #32321

So where are our shares promised to us in the February PR as a dividend of NTEK? To Meow's knowledge they have not mentioned again. Would that not be the actions of a scam company? You would think that by now if there was reasonable reason for the delay they would mention something about it. But as usual broken promises/lies are the norm at NTEK/NTGL.

Meow figures that there must be more than a few that have filed SEC complaints on this point alone. Wonder if Meow should find the old PR and file another complaint with the SEC to make sure that this is investigated?