Replies to post #59684 on Hemp Inc (HEMP)

[Fred Kadiddlehopper]

That machine is presented here like some kind of wonder. It is 1940's era technology, not much more sophisticated than Eli Whitney's cotton gin.
HEMP, Inc.'s ownership of this antique is no barrier to other, more well capitalized companies should this hemp business become a profitable agricultural pursuit. HEMP, Inc. could never stop Archer Daniels Midland or Dupont or Monsanto or Philip Morris from obtaining their own more modern, computerized versions of "the largest decorticator in North America" if they chose to enter the business. (But they won't, because there is no money in it.) HEMP, Inc. holds no intellectual property rights, i.e., patents, that would present a barrier to entry to any other, more businesslike competitor. That's a fact.
Good luck!
-Fritz

[worldisfullofDerps]

Is snapchat profitable, valued in the billions? Relativity is all-encompassing.

Writing is on the wall. More states will continue to legalize, until fed finally makes its move. Then banks, then Wall St, then kaboom! Revenue. Profit will be a function of sustaining max capacity and managing overhead.

This isn't an unknown recipe to success. Standard and historic business model, much like Dole, Del Monte, Frito-Lay, etc. All we need is a little help from our friends over at the Fed. It's that simple.

But a lot of fantastic stories floating around here.

Long Hemp