Replies to post #58142 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[zumantu]

well, if Hyman Phelps agrees with my assessment of label expansion as a possibility then I'm in good company

Kiwi, still holding out to argue?

[marzan]

North, I talked to my attorney friend, a fed, that he said lot of times settlement phase is mostly after the win going further into collecting monetary damages and in this case it could very well mean what our BB is claiming all along. He said they might go one at a time, first settlement from this PI, and then or concurrently from the exclusivity losses. Looks like something is going on that FDA could have corrected long ago.

[centurycom]

Once a court decides that FDA regulations are unconstitutional because they violate Free Speech Protections then I find it ridiculous that a company such as Amarin needs to go through all the expense and time of re- trying issues that have already been determined. The only way to stop this is to severely prosecute those executives who maliciously and continually intentionally disobey the Constitution. These people believe that they are above the law and erroneously believe they are doing this for the public good. Since the safety profile of fish oil has been known for years where could that type of stance even be considered a reason? Rather their reasoning in Amarins case should be considered more nefarious .