InvestorsHub Logo

jessellivermore

09/01/15 7:58 AM

#58136 RE: FishyFingers #58135

FF..

"A large part of me wonders if Vascepa will ever be approved as a triglyceride lowering agent, no matter how good the R-IT results are"

R-I is an outcomes study. The question it addresses is will Vascepa as an add on drug to patients at risk for CVD, on adequate statins, further lowered CVD risk.

The mechanism of action is not germane as long as it does not enter safety issues into the trial...The trig question is only of academic interest. So sleep peacefully.

":>) JL

TortLaw

09/01/15 9:30 AM

#58145 RE: FishyFingers #58135

Fishydigits: Re: Your question:"A large part of me wonders if Vascepa will ever be approved as a triglyceride lowering agent, no matter how good the R-IT results are."

Vascepa® is already FDA approved as a triglyceride lowering agent.

sts66

09/01/15 2:41 PM

#58195 RE: FishyFingers #58135

Overall, I agree with your train of thought - that targeting non-HDL-C is a better path than TGs - but there's a small problem IRL application - a normal lipid panel does not directly measure LDL-C, only TC, HDL-C and TGs, so there is no way for a PCP to distinguish non-HDL-C from LDL-C, both are wrapped up within the TC number.

However, I see no reason why AMRN could not alter their post R-IT sNDA to change the lipid target from TGs to non-HDL-C, as data from the trial will provide the numbers they need to do so.