InvestorsHub Logo

MIKEY501

08/28/15 12:30 AM

#94525 RE: janice shell #94524

It's certainly something new...I haven't seen anything quite like this before...this will be one to watch how this plays out but unlikely this one will be trading again soon and most likely NEVER again or on the grey sheets at best.

Renee

08/28/15 12:40 AM

#94532 RE: janice shell #94524

Extraordinary and elaborate. FINRA and possibly the SEC will want to go after whoever masterminded this labyrinth scheme.

Would the lawyer, James Scheltema, be the first person to pursue?

Skiluc

08/28/15 12:43 AM

#94536 RE: janice shell #94524

The 327M shares COR is referring to, could that be the known note holder? That's the only person I can see being ineligible for dividends, otherwise wasn't all other issued common stock getting dividend?

I'm referring to clause #30 specifically

If the case is that the 327M was that of the note holder, CRGP is done.

Otherwise I can see many holes in the lawsuit.

doogdilinger

08/28/15 12:45 AM

#94539 RE: janice shell #94524

The new twists on the scams never cease to amaze Janice...talk about "what will they think of next" right lmao!

And yet given all the evidence in the case the board's still chock full of koolaid drinking longs claiming CRGP did no wrong and there's gonna be an epic short squeeze tomorrow bwahhahahahhaa