Replies to post #8545 on Marker Therapeutics Inc (MRKR)

[TOB]

Some do.... then those are neanderthals. I suppose then that AAPL; NFLX; FACE; AMZN.... EVEN MSFT would then fit the bill! -maverick_1

In which case my original point stands. TPIV is OTC:QB, not OTC:Pink and not Pink Sheets.

As a valid yardstick everyone should look at this for TODAY's market dynamics especially looking at BB where TPIV, CTIX and others reside: -maverick_1

Neither are on the OTC:BB. They are both on OTC:Markets now which is largely replacing the OTC:BB

AND does not at all address the SUBSTANCE of the previous post: -maverick_1

I was addressing this substance:

Unfortunate Big dumping despite reversal of all mkts in last two days: WHY Uplisting is important: needs to grow up from pink sheets. -maverick_1

TPIV is OTC:QB, not Pink Sheets and not OTC:BB

http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/TPIV/quote

[maverick_1]

Illustrative of my commentary of TPIV is this intra day chart where even though markets exploded big to upside late Wed and early Thurs this is what happened to TPIV with BIG DOWNSIDE VOLUME (not present since beginning of this week thru Wed 3PM):

http://www.barchart.com/chart.php?sym=TPIV&style=technical&template=&p=I&d=X&im=&sd=&ed=&size=M&log=0&t=HLWCDL&v=1&g=1&evnt=1&late=1&o1=&o2=&o3=&sh=100&indicators=&addindicator=&submitted=1&fpage=&txtDate=#jump

Moreover, any technician does NOT want to see the following: TPIV shares hit a lower low and lower highs and lower close on BIGGER volume for both Wed and Thur which are diametrically opposite that the market, even XBI index.


So why in the face of a market confirmation to the upside (late yesterday and this morning) after those previous 6 consecutive downside mkt days would a TPIV shareholder SELL and in SIZE?: either overloaded, or margin selling and felt there were more timely investment alternatives with their money is the only logical explanation that comes to mind.

Unless there is BIG NEWS, shares need to stabilize and absorb whatever selling appears to flush it out: apparently beyond what EAM Investors et al could do?