Thank your for your information. I'm learning a lot about this matter.
I want to state that I'm long in Niocorp aswell because I don't want to put all my money on one horse. I initially bought Niocorp shares when scandium didn't play a role in this project. I'm pointing this out because I want to avoid confusion. I have the feeling people in the Niocorp board get quickly suspicious and there is a lot of tension over there. I often think that when I mention to them that I also own SCY they would asume that I try to spread negative posts about NIO.
BTT:
What is the advantage of making an off-take with SCY instead of NIO? Since the quality of the scandium should be the same and NIO is as reliable as SCY why would you prefer a special partner? I assume that off-takers are also interested in diversifing their producer and maybe we will see one off-take partner making an agreement with each project.
I'm a little diasappointed that my e-mail to SCY wasn't replied. I will writer another one tomorrow. In my opinion NIO is keeping the shareholders more up to date than SCY does. That's why I have the feeling that NIO is advancing quicker. But this feeling is not objective. Do you know when SCY plans to produce?