InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 135
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/20/2015

Re: TMLonggun post# 173

Saturday, 08/29/2015 11:59:08 AM

Saturday, August 29, 2015 11:59:08 AM

Post# of 264
Thank your for your information. I'm learning a lot about this matter.

I want to state that I'm long in Niocorp aswell because I don't want to put all my money on one horse. I initially bought Niocorp shares when scandium didn't play a role in this project. I'm pointing this out because I want to avoid confusion. I have the feeling people in the Niocorp board get quickly suspicious and there is a lot of tension over there. I often think that when I mention to them that I also own SCY they would asume that I try to spread negative posts about NIO.

BTT:

If you were an end user why would you make an off-take agreement with NIO instead of CLQ or SCY?

Nio will do some promotion and trailblazing just the same as CLQ and our own project has.



What is the advantage of making an off-take with SCY instead of NIO? Since the quality of the scandium should be the same and NIO is as reliable as SCY why would you prefer a special partner? I assume that off-takers are also interested in diversifing their producer and maybe we will see one off-take partner making an agreement with each project.

I'm a little diasappointed that my e-mail to SCY wasn't replied. I will writer another one tomorrow. In my opinion NIO is keeping the shareholders more up to date than SCY does. That's why I have the feeling that NIO is advancing quicker. But this feeling is not objective.
Do you know when SCY plans to produce?