Replies to post #3511 on Zalemark Holding Co Inc (ZMRK)

[I-Glow]

It seems a leopard doesn't doesn't change their spots!

The Jewelry Television lawsuit suggests that Zale hasn't changed and is still not doing things the right way!

Count I - Unfair Competition: Violation of Sections 32 and 43(a) of the Lanham Act.
[] Count II - Unlawful use of a Counterfeit Mark
[] Count III - Initial Interest Confusion
[] Count IV - Common Law Trademark Infringement
[] Count V - Violation of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act
[] Count VI - Unjust Enrichment

Too bad you don't like the message of Zale being exposed - but those are the facts.

I guess we now know why ZMRK has never tried to become a SEC filer!

IG