Tuesday, August 25, 2015 10:11:18 AM
The Jewelry Television lawsuit suggests that Zale hasn't changed and is still not doing things the right way!
Count I - Unfair Competition: Violation of Sections 32 and 43(a) of the Lanham Act.
[] Count II - Unlawful use of a Counterfeit Mark
[] Count III - Initial Interest Confusion
[] Count IV - Common Law Trademark Infringement
[] Count V - Violation of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act
[] Count VI - Unjust Enrichment
Too bad you don't like the message of Zale being exposed - but those are the facts.
I guess we now know why ZMRK has never tried to become a SEC filer!
IG
Avant Technologies Engages Wired4Tech to Evaluate the Performance of Next Generation AI Server Technology • AVAI • May 23, 2024 8:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. Unveils Collaboration with Celebrity Tattoo Artist Kat Tat for New Tattoo Aftercare Product • BLEG • May 22, 2024 8:30 AM
"Defo's Morning Briefing" Set to Debut for "GreenliteTV" • GRNL • May 21, 2024 2:28 PM
North Bay Resources Announces 50/50 JV at Fran Gold Project, British Columbia; Initiates NI 43-101 Resources Estimate and Bulk Sample • NBRI • May 21, 2024 9:07 AM
Greenlite Ventures Inks Deal to Acquire No Limit Technology • GRNL • May 17, 2024 3:00 PM
Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: SONG) Subsidiary Pro Music Rights Secures Final Judgment of $114,081.30 USD, Demonstrating Strength of Licensing Agreements • SONGD • May 17, 2024 11:00 AM