InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 735
Posts 75653
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/01/2012

Re: Betchips post# 3511

Tuesday, 08/25/2015 10:11:18 AM

Tuesday, August 25, 2015 10:11:18 AM

Post# of 26020
It seems a leopard doesn't doesn't change their spots!

The Jewelry Television lawsuit suggests that Zale hasn't changed and is still not doing things the right way!

Count I - Unfair Competition: Violation of Sections 32 and 43(a) of the Lanham Act.
[] Count II - Unlawful use of a Counterfeit Mark
[] Count III - Initial Interest Confusion
[] Count IV - Common Law Trademark Infringement
[] Count V - Violation of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act
[] Count VI - Unjust Enrichment


Too bad you don't like the message of Zale being exposed - but those are the facts.

I guess we now know why ZMRK has never tried to become a SEC filer!

IG

It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled