Just reading up on previous posts and have not seen the reaction of others but your theory makes perfect sense. Also explains why LQMT has done nothing during these passed few years.
Left to their own devices the LQMT management are helpless.
You believe the terms were "actively develop". Once you are sure these are the terms please sight the part of the contract that spells this out and I will consider if it has any plausibility. Even if true, it still doesn't give rationalization for renewing the license, since we know Apple continues to produce patents annually which covers this apparent clause for "actively developing" liquidmetal. They don't need to sign a liscense agreement to confirm what they are already doing.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
