Leagal event 6-24-15 Title: public notification in the ep bulletin as address of the adressee cannot be established Description:Free format text: NOTING OF LOSS OF RIGHTS PURSUANT TO RULE 112(1) EPC - FORM 1205A (19.03.2015)
PS: Update on the Panasonic patent which has prevented us from getting our patent due to 'lack of non-obviousness' from prior art. This is the prior art Today 8-22-2015 this prior art is in the public domain. Meaning it is open for any company to commercialize and sell in the U.S.
accipterr, I think you have something here. We might see a update from 3d regarding this. It is strange that Jim brought up the idea of hiring someone to pursue manufacturing of the cell at this time. TIMING IS EVERYTHING
There's only one Panasonic patent which I think is what what Bucky is referencing in post 44274:
"...Panasonic got an immediate extension on the patent at the time of issue. That was because we were originally denied a patent and then had to file an appeal. So, they got an extension for the length of the appeal process, which was something like 1000 days. I have to look back to verify the exact number. "
Buckys reference of the "they" I take to mean Panasonic with the 1000 days extension beginning today. This topic was all hashed out in April and Buckys the guy who understands it the best so try poking him sometime Monday and compare notes.