Replies to post #26406 on Tauriga Sciences Inc (fka TAUG)

[rawman]

OH MY...the investment community is very sad that TAUG and its CEO were "blind-sided"! (A tear is now dripping from the shareholders' eyes!) How about the TAUG investors that were "BLIND-SIDED" by your inane decision to delay filing the PASSED DUE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT? How many "points" did this "fine" decision cost the shareholders? Investors like transparency and Seth Shaw CHOSE to provide NO RATIONALE to justify the decision to delay the 10-K! But now the CEO claims to be "blind sided"! LMAO! For what reason would TAUG CHOOSE TO NOT FILE THE 10-K when it was DUE, albeit late, on JULY 15? Why did the company wait for the special shareholder meeting and the Authorized Share increase, as it had NOTHING TO DO WITH THE 2015 10-K? The fiscal year was OVER on March 31, 2015! It is now AUGUST 6, 2015! The company has provided no financial information since FEBRUARY! Had TAUG, under YOUR direction, not waited to file, would TAUG now be a "LIMITED INFORMATION PINKIE"? Beautiful! What a clever strategy! There was absolutely NO LOGICAL REASON to delay the filing! If there was, THE LOGIC WAS NEVER PUBLICLY DISCLOSED VIA ONE OF THE INFAMOUS PRESS RELEASES! BOTTOM-LINE...TAUG AND ITS VAUNTED, YET UNQUALIFIED AND INEXPERIENCED MANAGEMENT TEAM, FOULED UP AND THE SHAREHOLDERS ARE GETTING WHACKED!

WHY DID TAUG IGNORE THE SEC FILING REGULATIONS AND NOT FILE AS SPECIFIED BY THE EXTENDED DUE DATE FOR THE 10-K OF JULY 15??? APPARENTLY THE NT 10-K WAS JUST SMALL FIB!

[rawman]

The Company was shocked (even blind sided) to learn...

If you are interested, this poster will provide a TOP 10 LIST of how TAUG shareholders have been "BLIND SIDED" by management's actions over the last 12 to 15 months! If I recall, until earlier this month, Seth Shaw was a part of the MANAGEMENT TEAM, acting in the role of "MONEY MAN" and VP OF STRATEGIC PLANNING! Shall we start with Honeywood or maybe Typenex or maybe the "death of Pilus" or dumping the company's only revenue stream or whatever! The list will be incredibly easy to compile! IT'S HURTS TO GET BLIND-SIDED! WELCOME TO THE REAL WORLD!

[diannedawn]

Could you please explain in detail for me WHAT "False Information" I'm allegedly "spreading"?

The spreading of False Information really must stop

I'll be happy to quit "spreading" any information I KNOW to be FALSE.

I ASK QUESTIONS...
I seek answers and attempt to determine what is TRUE.
I have gotten very little in the way of REAL answers out of you...
I am not just going to take your "word" for things...
PROOF would be nice...

Is ASKING questions
or posting FACTS/STATEMENTS from the FILINGS/PR's "spreading False information"?
(I would certainly hope not as those things are suppose to contain information that is TRUE!)
I disagree that I am "spreading False Information"...
I will need a specific example(s).

BTW...disagreeing with you, criticizing things that have been done, or saying I do not believe you is not slander/libel
as you seem to believe.
This is still a free country and I can have an OPINION.
I am usually also happy to point out WHY I believe this or that.

...have you read
http://ihwiki.advfn.com/index.php?title=FAQ:Deletions_and_Restores
"It is understood that all posts on the site are to be considered opinions. They do not need to indicate this in their posts."
"Members do not have to provide "proof" when offering their opinions. There is no requirement for Members to substantiate their posts. Veracity of posts and credibility of the author is determined by the reader."
I often DO provide links...many do not...
STILL
""Truth" is a very subjective term and neither Site Admin nor Mods remove posts based on judgments of this type. Each reader has both the right and obligation to decide for themselves if they feel a post is accurate and its author credible."

I have ASKED repeatedly if Cowan will CONFIRM that TAUG was not notified prior to July 23rd.
I've heard your story...Shouldn't we hear THEIR side?
I have stated WHY I do not feel your timeline is believable...
I am NOT the ONLY person who does not believe you...
look at the poll...
WHY SINGLE ME OUT???
Maybe I would be more inclined to believe it if Stella had not departed...suddenly...right before the 10K extension was due to run out (7/15).
Or maybe if Cowan had not been abruptly dismissed on June 15th (8K on 6/19).
WHY was Cowan dismissed, 2 weeks before the 10K was due???


I already said

While I agree there was a mistake made by the auditor,
I also fail to see how TAUG could possibly stand to receive millions
as has been claimed.

Are you of the opinion that TAUG will receive millions? If not, then why do you not feel the need to correct FALSE "positive" information?
An OPINION seems to be floating around that

Looks like Cowan has made an offer.... Of course not admitting guilt or any wrong doing... Lmao
Just a matter of time before they meet in the middle !!!

Put that together with THIS

Of course if I was Seth, I'd settle for let's say $3 million but I'd take $1.5 million ;)
Naaaa .... Make it an even $2 million then buy back shares !!!!

That is why you claim you are here...to correct misinformation...and yet there have been several instances of misinformation that went uncorrected.
Here's another fine example...
I was not here much last year; but from reading the backstory I have found that there was MISINFORMATION circulating about a GRANT.
Apparently, neither YOU, or anyone else, ever corrected this MISINFORMATION;
as it was STILL believed as of this spring when Prof Hassett finally CORRECTED it!
An email posted by the new BOD member shows this...

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=113675424&txt2find=grant

This is an email response from Prof Hassett

Dear XXXXXXXXX:

The following are my responses to your queries.

1.Is the 1,700,000 grant awarded last year still available or is it depleted by now? Anymore grants on the horizon?
ANSWER: I’m not sure where you received that information. We were never awarded $1,700,000. However, we were “encouraged” to submit a large ARPA-E grant in collaboration with Dale Schaefer in our Engineering Department. This is very good news. We had to submit a pre-proposal that passed the first round of cuts. Again, very good news!

It seems you do not CARE about "correcting misinformation".
Instead you seem to focus on "negative" information...


But lets move on...
This is a shining example of the type of answer/information you provide.

As for the $80,000 investment that is being referenced, there is no correlation between that and anything having to do with Typenex. To makes this point abundantly clear, the Company wired $230,000 USD to Typenex in early June 2015 to satisfy all obligations under the January 2015 settlement agreement between Typenex and Tauriga. The wire from Group 10 Holdings was received in mid July 2015, a month and a half later. Clearly this $80,000 was NOT used to pay Typenex.

The QUESTION was

TAURIGA SCIENCES, INC. Files SEC form 8-K, Change in Directors or Principal Officers, Financial Statements and ExhibiEDGAR Online(Fri, Jul 17)
FUNNY THING ABOUT THIS 8K...WHY DIDN'T IT INCLUDE "Item 1.01: Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement" + "Item 3.02: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities" FOR THE GROUP 10 NOTE???

I think it SHOULD have been in the 8K...FILED THE VERY SAME DAY (7/17)...not just the DEF 14A (7/17)
I will be asking the SEC to clarify that for me.

I have ASKED repeatedly for this to be explained...and you STILL basically ignored the issue...

Clearly this $80,000 was NOT used to pay Typenex.

CLEARLY? HOW IS THAT CLEAR???
It was not for Typenex? GREAT...BUT THEN WHAT "FINAL SETTLEMENT" WAS IT FOR???
IS THERE ANOTHER "FINAL SETTLEMENT" THAT THE SHAREHOLDERS ARE NOT AWARE OF???
Because I am only aware of ONE "final settlement"...Typenex...
WHAT DID I MISS???
I'm not making this wording up...ITS COMES DIRECTLY FROM YOUR FILING!!!
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1142790/000149315215003021/def14a.htm
"On July 14, 2015, the Company entered into a Convertible Debenture with Group 10 Holdings, LLC (“Group 10”) in the principal amount of $96,000 with a maturity date of July 14, 2016 (the “Group 10 Note”). The Company received gross proceeds of $80,000 under the Group Note. The proceeds from the Group 10 Note were used for the payment under the Final Settlement Agreement. The Company granted Group 10 15,000,000 commitment shares of common stock in consideration of the Group 10 Note."

You come here and say it was not for Typenex...but completely fail to explain the wording in the filing...
OR why it was not in the 8K...filed the very same day (7/17) as the filing it DID appear in (the DEF 14A 7/17)!

Its these little omissions of details that lead me to mistrust you.
Here is yet another example...
You have said you discovered the auditor/audit problem July 23rd.
The majority of the people who answered the poll feel the shareholders should have been told about the auditor BEFORE the vote....even that the vote should have been postponed.
What was stopping you from putting out the information on the 24th...or even the morning of the 27th???
Obviously, you decided that was something that the shareholders did not need to know...
You did not even share that information in the days AFTER the vote...
INSTEAD you said ...TAUG was "granted a 7 calendar day extension by OTC Markets to continue trading on the OTCQB exchange despite the Company's inability to file its Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2015 ("Form 10-K") with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") prior to 5:30 pm EDT today, July 29, 2015. If this extension had not been granted, Tauriga's common stock would have been moved to the OTC Pink Limited Information category at open of trading Thursday, July 30, 2015."
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/tauriga-sciences-inc-granted-7-204955800.html
WHY??? Was it because you THOUGHT you had everything under control?
From the next PR..."Upon knowledge of this Order, the Company worked tirelessly to find a solution to this issue to find the best way to protect our shareholders.

Specifically, the Company contacted the PCAOB on Thursday July 23, 2015. On Friday July 24, 2015, the PCAOB replied back informing the Company that the issue was out of the PCAOB's jurisdiction and that the SEC would need to determine the appropriate course of action.

During this period, the Company obtained a seven day extension from OTC Markets to maintain its OTCQB listing which was granted on Wednesday July 29, 2015 based on written representations from the Predecessor Audit Firm that it would be able to re-issue its audit report for the year ended March 31, 2014."
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/tauriga-sciences-inc-comments-status-120000855.html
Did you decide, WHY bother the shareholders with those pesky DETAILS of what is REALLY going on???
You didn't bother to tell the shareholders until you had NO CHOICE...

Will the SEC agree that this was the proper course of action???
I definitely will ASK!!!

While we're at it, and since BVAP is a JV partner of TAUG...
Can you explain why an article appeared with THIS in it?
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=115924361

Breathe is currently working with Pfizer to determine which medical substance should be first dispensed from its devices to the pharmaceutical company's distribution channel. Frank Orlowski, vice president of emerging markets for Pfizer, is on Breathe's advisory board

Can you explain WHY a day later that section was removed?
GOOD LUCK tracking down all the places the original has been copied to!
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=115969256

What is it they say about the net...once its out there...its out there forever?
Loose lips sink ships?
If it was TRUE, then WHY WAS IT REMOVED???

Or maybe you could comment on the photoshopped van/photoshopped bus stop advert social media posts...
CAN YOU PROVE THOSE WERE NOT PHOTOSHOPPED???
'cuz I've seen pretty convincing evidence that they were....

Some have said that you are very honest etc.
I disagree.
That's not LIBEL.

Time will tell if am I wrong...