donot, this is what many don't understand, they think that everything is black and white regarding assets, ie, this is the banks and this is the holding companies.
what should have happened is sussman should have immediately sued fdick and jpm. maybe easier said than done in hindsight but in reality sussman took the easy way out. maybe pressure from the judge maybe not, maybe "collusion" with jpm, maybe not, maybe pressure from the higher ups at sussmans firm to not rock the boat to much against jpm hoping for future business from them, maybe not. bottom line, he did not sue jpm and/or fdick and now it ain't going to happen.
jpm has now had several years to dice, slice and launder all of wamu holding company assets. LIKE YOU SAID, IN ONE INSTANCE WMI MEANT THE BANK IN ANOTHER IT MEANT THE HOLDING COMPANY.
The escrow hopefuls think that someone is going to ride in on a white horse and turn over the assets because they may rightfully belong to the holding company.
No one is talking about the wamu holding company but a few poster on a message board and that means lights out for escrow unfortunately. all imo