Couldn't a "legitimate" company that can only borrow or sell shares to pay it's bills and prove unable to generate real income be considered a scam? Most companies would do the honorable/moral thing and file for bankruptcy after a reasonable number of years of failure.
If I had a sibling who could only borrow money ave couldn't hold a steady job, I'd consider them a scam regardless of them being a legitimate sibling.
20+ years of failure is more than reasonable time to prove Bradley is not able to make this company work for anyone other than himself.
Yeah, those pictures of PNTV leadership with Monk must have been photoshopped and PNTV promoting Monk's "seminars" faked.
Oh wait, are you saying that PNTV didn't realize Monk was scamming everyone and hasn't made a dime in 2 decades and now has almost no revenue - and that makes them great leaders?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
