InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

BigBang

07/22/15 9:53 AM

#429858 RE: zeus_0100 #429857

I tend to disagree with you. Please read carefully the post by JusticeWillWin referenced below.

And that's why the term "Premiums Received at Resolution" (and NOT Purchase Price Received at Resolution) is at the FDIC Balance Sheet

Read my other post first, it is important: investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=115592609

wmish.com/docs/FDIC/WaMuReceivershipFinancialStatements(unaudited)thru123108.pdf


icon url

duder54

07/22/15 10:34 AM

#429860 RE: zeus_0100 #429857

WMB is gone .. But the WMI (parent of WMB) was not for them to touch
icon url

Docsavag

07/22/15 10:37 AM

#429861 RE: zeus_0100 #429857

Not likely... FDIC cannot simply "deem" anything without audited results for verification.
icon url

PickStocks

07/22/15 11:42 AM

#429864 RE: zeus_0100 #429857

The fdic auctioned off the wmb, jpm agreed to the req. payment of $50,000,000 plus a bid of $1.88 Billion. The bid was accepted, and jpm has paid it in full. the assets list calling for book value, was deemed by the fdic that book value was equal to jpm's bid, closed, shut, and done, the WMB is gone for good!

Precisely the hitting the nail, Rosencrap also believes this as true because there is no money after this for equity....After JPM paid the 50 million he cherry picked the good mortgages and profited without actually getting true book value......

If the FDIC wanted to put it all up for sale for 1.00 they could have....The law is behind them.
icon url

popcorn202

07/22/15 12:05 PM

#429871 RE: zeus_0100 #429857

And your source for your statement please?