InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

player1234

07/08/15 12:46 PM

#242827 RE: aleajactaest #242826

The float would be incredibly small. Of course, since selling product doesn't appear to be a strong point for the current management team, maybe they could just place many millions more shares and hire more high ranking military buddies into the office of the CEO.
icon url

Bluefang

07/08/15 1:12 PM

#242828 RE: aleajactaest #242826

What about 3 reverse splits? [if there's a third].

Besides, the market cap deficiency may put the lights out on Wave before anything else does.

Does anyone know when the market cap deficiency clock started to run?

Alea, Player, anyone: in your opinion, what would be the effect of another funding at the present price? It sure looks as if the end is real near.

Blue
icon url

Down And Out Man

07/08/15 2:15 PM

#242830 RE: aleajactaest #242826

"How about 1 for 20 so they don't have to keep doing the same thing"

That's what I was lobbying for last time. And a one for ten the first time. And here we go again (one would assume.)

Not that it much matters anymore. Won't lift the market cap one bit, and that's a looming issue.

What a long, drawn out, pathetic story.

D&O