The opportunity to commit misconduct (like cherry picking) always exists.
But it is prejudicial to even raise the issue unless there is clear evidence that this type of trial rigging might be happening.
Beyond that, what IMUC did is what IMUC did.
What NWBO is doing, is what NWBO is doing.
Beyond being involved in cancer immunotherapy, they bear little relationship to one another.
Here is an example of why tarring them with the same brush is wrong:
Many child care workers have the opportunity to commit molestation and may or may not be motivated to do so. Daycare facilities have controlled access and are not fully transparent to outsiders.
It would be highly prejudicial to publicly speculate that a specific day care owner, say, Mrs. Joanna Q. Citizen might have committed molestation simply because the opportunity may exist and because someone in another daycare in another state did it at some point in time.
Just the public speculation could hurt or even destroy Mrs. Joanna Q. Citizen's business by causing people to withdraw their children or not enroll them there in the first place.
Similarly, speculating, without evidence, that NWBO might have cherry picked patients to inflate Direct Phase 1 results could hurt NWBO and more importantly cause both patients and investors to miss out on an opportunity.
Happily, the time when message board posts about NWBO, either good or bad, can influence this stock is quickly drawing to a close.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
