InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Green n Gold

06/06/15 8:27 PM

#60237 RE: paper123 #60236

Yup and I would say the significance of these two revolutions in tech are rather equal(provided a large tech corp can put this in the spotlight). I know that seems like a big claim but I'm gonna do a bit of a blast from the past and remind everyone that THIS IS TRULY REVOLUTIONARY TECH AND WE ARE IN UNCHARTED TERRITORIES. This could be as big as the cell phone itself! I think we all know the potential no matter what you type you know the truth
icon url

light1soldier

06/07/15 6:56 AM

#60259 RE: paper123 #60236

in reference to you tube, just a little info.....


YouTube began as a venture-funded technology startup, primarily from a $11.5 million investment by Sequoia Capital between November 2005 and April 2006.[13] YouTube's early headquarters were situated above a pizzeria and Japanese restaurant in San Mateo, California.[14] The domain name www.youtube.com was activated on February 14, 2005, and the website was developed over the subsequent months.[15]

The first YouTube video, titled Me at the zoo, shows co-founder Jawed Karim at the San Diego Zoo.[16] The video was uploaded on April 23, 2005, and can still be viewed on the site.[17]

YouTube offered the public a beta test of the site in May 2005, six months before the official launch in November 2005. The site grew rapidly, and in July 2006 the company announced that more than 65,000 new videos were being uploaded every day, and that the site was receiving 100 million video views per day.[18] According to data published by market research company comScore, YouTube is the dominant provider of online video in the United States, with a market share of around 43% and more than 14 billion views of videos in May 2010.[19]

as you can see the public was offered beta-testing a whole 6 months before launch...
that is something that VOIS has failed to do...
also you tube was funded by an investment from Sequoia Capital...
It is disconcerting that vois has failed to garner any support from any technology company....

whereas vois has only one employee,big bonuses when money should be spent on garnering support and manufacturing etc...

point of matter here though is youtube was beta-tested a whole 6 months before launch and it grew from there...
vois has yet to let anyone test it or release a professional video of the bci device working with some third party present to verify it...
vois is holding everything close to it's chest for a reason, it doesn't work as touted...

dilution continues, cash burn is growing,etc....
the only thing evident in vois's neartime future is a dismal launch of bci device,that is if it isn't delayed yet further because of funding...
vois has no interest from any tech companies,evident by it's inability to MERGE or be acquired by any....
most tech companies see vois as it really is....just words....
youtube had a tech. company that invested in it before launch...
vois, well you know the story from there...