I don't believe the total damage numbers disclosed yet, but the plaintiff did apparently indicate they will be seeking a 2.5% royalty if I understood correctly.
One thing I thought interesting was that apparently at some point in the opening statements, Ms. Elliot actually showed the jury an executive summary from Schrader itself that said something to the extent that corporate risk is perceived as high for IP infringement. One could assume the inference appears to be that Schrader itself knew that they would be infringing others IP and had internally already identified and documented that risk in their own executive summary. Pretty interesting stuff.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
