InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

PacificNW

06/01/15 12:12 PM

#35410 RE: Alextwolfe #35403

Thank you for starting the fair and balanced discussion that is desperately needed here. As much as I don't like what Pyrr writes simply because it is negative we must thank him for helping open our eyes to what is really happening hee, the good the bad or the ugly.
So thank you for starting the needed discussion, something that I am not capable of dong due to my ignorance in the field of immunotherapy.
I do not trust mgmt.'s messages due to their survival instinct, nor do I trust anyone here incl Pyrr because of their individual greed, I trust only the miraculous results that I hope around the corner that will hopefully cure cancer.
icon url

Alextwolfe

06/01/15 8:09 PM

#35461 RE: Alextwolfe #35403

Method A versus Method B from dwiggd on the Yahoo forum:

" at least 12 of the still living patients were enrolled prior to the summer of last year, so they can't all be method A. (perhaps he meant B)

That since we don't know what the difference between Method A and B is, they could both be variations on BCG/inf-y.

Or that the paper could have been written on only one method even though both were in use.

And that he (Pyrr) is still ignoring the fact that his claimed switch between method A and B has to have happened at 13.8 months ago, when 4 patients were treated at the same time, and thus there is no possible "changeover date" from method A to B, and both have to have overlapped.

His (Pyrr's) theories just don't match up with the timeline."