InvestorsHub Logo

Kap10jak

05/31/15 3:06 PM

#35254 RE: PacificNW #35253

Who are you?

Turtle65

05/31/15 3:10 PM

#35255 RE: PacificNW #35253

AFFORD-------

Let the results speak for themselves.......BUSINESS 101.

DIRECT------AMAZING
DCVAX-L-----AMAZING


HE,PIM,4 COUNTRIES NOW...AMAZING

GOOD CASH POSITION w/ manufacturing RAMPING UP---AMAZING

WHO cares what PYRR says...

GO NWBO !!!

Jack2479

05/31/15 3:25 PM

#35256 RE: PacificNW #35253

I honestly have a tear rolling down my cheek laughing at what you have just written. I'm not sure your actually cut out for trading shares. If you don't trust anyone from NWBO and discount the updates or PR and you are not shorting the stock and so have no interest in driving the price down then why are you invested at all?

TC_Trader

05/31/15 3:35 PM

#35258 RE: PacificNW #35253

You think some random dude named PYrr on this message board has control over the action on Monday? Your whole post is now irrelevant just because of that statement. Wow

GoodGuyBill

05/31/15 3:37 PM

#35259 RE: PacificNW #35253

Regarding Pyrr, he has July puts. If NWBO goes down below $7 as he predicts, He profits. He has a vested interest in NWBO temporarily going down below $7.

dpinvest

05/31/15 3:37 PM

#35260 RE: PacificNW #35253

What Pyr wrote last November as alias Steve Giardino on SA was a joke too. I admit I liked it as a cheerleading response to the BS anti-NWBO bloggers before it, but the thesis of backing into Phase 3 success based on the scraps of evidence reported to that point was an analytical farce. The fact that he's trying to use his crack biotech knowledge to take the other side and doing so, in my opinion, more unsuccessfully is a testament to his unreliable creepiness.

RRRichmond

05/31/15 11:22 PM

#35320 RE: PacificNW #35253

For those of you that must know . .

I am the walrus. Cookoo cachu.

At this point, in order for Pyrr to be correct, Linda Powers, Les Goldman, Drs. Boynton, Bosch, Subiah, et al, Liau, Prins, and another 80 or so are in a "Rosemay's Baby" type consort.

I think not.