Replies to post #89000 on DD Support Board and Research Team

[1manband]

Actually, as has been proven over and over, the 2012 were "stale" when the Form 10 was filed, and it was required to be filed with the 2014 statements. The Company ignored the regulations and filed it anyway. Which I am sure the SEC let them know about in no uncertain terms in the comment letter. But HHSE has a history of ignoring SEC regulations and just filing whatever they want, whenever they want.

The due date for 2014 annual statements for registrants does not apply to registration statements. The regulations for which financial statements must be included in registration statements, and their age, are very different.

[jobynimble]

But why has it taken so long? Why isn't Parkinson hiring a Big Four firm and spending the money to get it done? Is it just bad luck finding accountants/lawyers that get into trouble just to try and save a few dollars? Doesn't that alone speak volumes of why there are so many skeptics? Five years, sheesh!!

[integral]

What a complete screw up by Eric and Don, wasting time and capital. Why did they screw this up so poorly? Inept?

[MoneyMan]

Ok, still does not explain why they filed it with 2013 fins on March 11, 2015.

So the plan was to file it with stale fins and then amend with 2014? That goes in the face of HHSE CEO's own words:

2). Auditor Notification - The audits for 2012 and 2013 were completed under an agreement between HHSE and Terry L. Johnson, CPA. The company only hired Johnson for those two specific years, and we stated at our shareholder's meeting that the plan for future periods was to utilize one of the larger auditing firms (now that a historic basis for prior years had been established). The company is also using one of the top Library Valuation firms for a revisit of the company's film & television library.

http://www.hannoverhousemovies.blogspot.com/2015_04_01_archive.html