Replies to post #70261 on Liquidmetal Technologies Inc (LQMT)

[HIKER_II]

I have to agree with watts on this. If you buy a company you must adhere to the contracts that exist within the company. There is no way that apple and its lawyers didn't write that perfectly clear in their contract arrangement. They could sell this company a hundred times and without apples consent the new owner time and again would have no rights to consumer electronics, period.

[Watts Watt]

Have you read the MTA excerpt I gave you?

Nothing in the agreement permits what you are alleging.

[Watts Watt]

Have you read the MTA excerpt I gave you?

Nothing in the agreement permits what you are alleging. Such actions you propose would be a total breach of contract and subject to patent infringement penalties IMMEDIATELY.

It's a shame that our resident lawyer on the IHUB Board does not chime in. However, this subject, as you laid out has been discussed NUMEROUS times since August of 2010 with some very fine legal experts participating. Wishful thinking, "tell me it isn't so", or "it has to be this way" posturing does not change the text of the MTA, a copy of which I was so gracious in providing you to read.

Now you should be seeing some light and seeing how the Liquidmetal shareholders screwed from the very beginning by this contract whipped up by Steipp and Chung.

Welcome to the first step of "Giving away the farm" and your future share value with this revenue=less contract that your heroes made on your behalf.