Kag, I will agree about the information from speaking with a CEO. I have personal experience with an occasion where I was told a direct lie by a CEO. I am not saying that Dr. Moro would do the same but what they generally do is beat around the bush and let you fill in the blanks. You tend to fill in those blanks the way you want them to be filled, not necessarily accurately.
Dr. Moro's latest press releases leave a lot to be desired for clarity.
headache's post:
"I decided to ask Dr. Moro whether the statement that "We do not know yet if the normal RECAF concentration is constant enough to make this personalization possible" from the May 16 release has any bearing on the standard assay. He basically said it does not, reiterating the natural interpretation (at least for me) of the PR that he was discussing a possible improvement of the test when he made the remarks about personalization. Nothing in the PR should be construed as casting the RECAF enterprise into doubt"
Why would he say "basically is does not"? It either affects it or it doesn't. More hedging. Did you actually ask him if he indeed has a new test that does not use radioactivity and was it used in the latest studies? I would like to know that for sure.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
