He nailed it when he said "The fact that Linda refutes my argument by citing the 2013 Cell paper by the TCGA Research Network and their 21,540 figure indicates that either 1) she misunderstood my argument or 2) she is presenting a straw man argument to avoid addressing the real issue."
Note, this isn't the first time we've seen straw man arguments to avoid discussing the real issues.
What I found the most interesting, was the exchange between someone with a close personal experience with DCVAX in a fight against cancer and the author:
" My sincere apologies Mark. As we've been able to speak offline I've gotten a chance to understand your viewpoints and the opportunity to present the data that you've accumulated in your own research to share with others. I hope in the future I will be more open to welcoming opposing views as iron certainly sharpens iron. The more we learn, the more we realize how much we don't know.
Best wishes to you."
Ben demonstrates integrity and a very open minded approach that we should all try to emulate. Of course some here would rather try to discredit anyone with personal attacks if/when their statements don't fit an eternally bullish perspective of NWBO and all things related. Okay, head back in the sand. Carry on..