Replies to post #5744 on Saleen Automotive, Inc. (fka SLNN)

[FredVestor]

Again. I'm asking for an explanation as to why. It looks like the author of the article on Saleen said the truth while Saleen and their representative lied. I'd like to see anyone proved otherwise.

What is not right in these comment regardless of where the author is from:

You say that, but then all you say is about his credibility. Truth of the matter is. no one can disprove anything FREDERIC LAMBERT said in his article:

Quote:
In this video Max claims that Saleen managed to increase the range of the Model S, but when asked what the range of the car actually is, he could only answer “250 miles or 350 miles… I’m not sure”. How can someone claim to have increased the range of a car that he doesn’t even know the range of? After contacting Saleen’s PR department about this issue, they made the following comment:

“We (including our representatives) have not yet released any statistics on our FOURSIXTEEN.”


Saleen's rep clearly lied about this. And to further prove this, the video was since made private after the publishing of the article. Clearly someone didn't want that video public.

No one can effectively disprove this.

Quote:
Steve Saleen said to USA TODAY that he “regeared [the car] for quicker acceleration” which should result in a “up to three-tenths of a second faster” zero to 60mph time.


8 months later Saleen has yet to release any performance statistic on the vehicle. Pretty much proving the author's point.

Same thing about the MRSP. In the video, the Saleen employee clearly stated the MRSP then Saleen deny it the next day.

The warranty claim is clear. No one is saying Tesla can void the warranty without cause, but they can easily claim any defect is due to the modification since the car is software heavy and rely on algorithms. If inputs are wrongfully altered , the algorithms' output will be flawed. This can easily damaged the most important and arguably fragile part of the car; the battery.

Every sources were posted

sources:

Quote:
Derek Hall email: imgur.com/2abYwzG

Saleen’s PR response: https://imgur.com/GdL4TZn

Saleen FOURSIXTEEN press statement: media.saleen.com/2014/08/FOURSIXTEEN/

Saleen AC propulsion press statement: www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/saleen-automotive-adds-ac-propulsion-to-design-team-for-new-saleen-electric-vehicle-245958871.html

USA TODAY article about the FOURhttp://www.usatoday.com/story/money/cars/2014/08/17/steve-saleen-tesla-model-s/14196127/

Saleen FOURSIXTEEN video:

Tesla Model S: http://www.teslamotors.com/models/features#/performance

SLNN ads on Investor Hubs: http://investorshub.advfn.com/Saleen-Automotive-Inc-SLNN-26492/

Tesla Model S warranty: http://www.teslamotors.com/sites/default/files/blog_attachments/model_s_quick_guide_-_na_rev_d_for_web.pdf



More to come soon. Saleen is busy these days, but no for the reasons investors would like. :)

[AutoInvestor]

Pull one of maybe two stupid Saleen Tesla's
into a Tesla dealership and just try and file a warranty claim
on a part failure resulting from a change in the timing
or the changes to the suspension.
According to Tesla the Warranty Claim will be rejected if it
ever even submitted by the service center.
The Saleen changes will result in the customer
having to pay 100% for the repairs.