InvestorsHub Logo

jmurfk

04/21/15 10:33 PM

#24333 RE: cpw13154 #24332

Not seeing your point, and that wasn't a good post to quote. At the time of that post, I was 100% accurate. A claim was made about the stock dropping under .06 very soon. Months down the road, it hadn't dropped as claimed, lol. So, then the claim was made of how it was "close" to .06. Still though, it never went under .06 at that time. Again, bad quote on that one. I could give two shxxs about where it is now. I never said it wasn't going to .0000.

Next time you quote, actually respond to that post, so posters can see what's being responded to.


jmurfk Thursday, 12/05/13 07:55:22 AM
Re: cpw13154 post# 13773
Post # of 24332
The cold hard facts here are, it never went to .06 or under .20 as we repeatedly heard it would months ago, lol. So now we have to hear all this justification of how it was close, lol. I would say its a nice attempt at redemption. Fact remains, it didn't go under .20, to .06, and the last loss was less than half of what we were repeatedly told it would be, lol.