InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

pinkstocktrader

04/18/15 3:52 PM

#33362 RE: Pyrrhonian #33361

hey Pyrr nice to see you back. Why is CLDX valued at 3 billion. Thanks in advance for your reply...
icon url

highwayman4life

04/18/15 5:32 PM

#33366 RE: Pyrrhonian #33361

Whether you know it or not, it won't come from Direct Ph I or anywhere else out of NWBO trials for a while. They can only maintain the facade that "something big is coming just around the next corner" for so long.


icon url

beachlifeisfun

04/18/15 6:29 PM

#33367 RE: Pyrrhonian #33361

STIIIILLL looking to make some money off of those July puts you bought eh? Good luck with that. Looking through your post history and corresponding expiration dates says it all.
icon url

TZOR

04/18/15 6:56 PM

#33368 RE: Pyrrhonian #33361

Pyr, you mention that woodfords hands are tied.....ok. For the sake of argument lets say his hands are tied (with a profit). Do you know who else has tied hands? That's right the 9.3mil shorts on record have tied hands (at a loss) an they are paying interest. In my opinion there is a greater chance of the shorts having to tap out (close their short position at a loss) than there is of Woodford closing his position out at a profit. Why would that be? The short position is beholden to a brokerage house/bank that is facilitating their position (extending them credit or shares). The bank/brokerage house charges interest, tightening the vice on the short position. As they lose day in and day out and accumulate interest expense the probability that they are forced to close their position is light years ahead of Woodford being forced to close his position (again Woodford has a profit). I understand you are more knowledgeable about FDA studies than I am, but you do not know market dynamics more than I do. Market dynamics are bullish, the financing has been provided, and will most likely be provided moving forward of necessary. I am not sorry for your put losses. When it comes to capitalism your put bet was poor, because you lost capital.
icon url

dpinvest

04/18/15 10:19 PM

#33371 RE: Pyrrhonian #33361

Is this really the dude who wrote a 20 page can't lose thesis on SA last year? Trying to back into inevitable success on P3 for L thru past data and studies? I feel like I've warped into an alternative universe. They will get more Woodfords, just a matter of short time, leading to what you claim is more manipulation. Because DCVAX is a compelling and quite promising treatment, on its own or as an option to combine with others, and one that more and more dollars will stand behind. Y'know, I remember talking with Les soon after your "epic" article came out last year, and I was amazed that he said that he never talked with you, that you never tried to contact him or anyone at the company, ever.
icon url

HappyLibrarian

04/18/15 11:01 PM

#33372 RE: Pyrrhonian #33361

You ignored the Hospital Exemption in your scenario.

I'm curious why you seem to think that HE won't be a significant factor for NWBO in the next six to eight months.



icon url

flipper44

04/19/15 10:26 AM

#33383 RE: Pyrrhonian #33361

I'm sorry you lost money buying puts when you schlepped them around here recently. I'm sorry you did not find the information arm data extremely encouraging. I personally thought it was strong data and appropriately released by Dr. Bosch. I'm sorry you feel that Neil Woodford's investment in NWBO was motivated by manipulative price interference. I personally think he did his due diligence, and he is in for the long haul. I'm sorry you feel inclined to frame the two matters above as "pumping."

I am happy for patients that DCVax is moving forward and not as vulnerable to attack by various ne'er-do-wells.

Enjoy the weather.