InvestorsHub Logo

tdtcal

04/16/15 3:36 PM

#36539 RE: tykundegex #36538

You mean run a prototype MRFC or ERC?

Produce fuel usage / watts output / MTBF data? Things like that?

Wasn't that what the ERC pilot project was supposed to do? (Not actually questioning you...)

Or the MRFC demo?

Doesn't better technology require less "selling"?

"Starting" to think there is a fatal "flaw" in the "commercial ability" of this technology.

The only thing that goes "round and round" at Mantra is their story. Their technology, not so much.

Sad.

uksausage

04/16/15 3:37 PM

#36540 RE: tykundegex #36538

I too got screwed in Niagara falls (still not sure how much we conscious fraud and what was just naive business practices by great technologists - sounds familiar!), and have learned my lesson so waiting and watching what happens here.

Also hit by debt ridden companies in the e-cig markets so lots of lessons and now much more solid in my DD and risk taking or tolerance to falling prices. At least we don't have debt issues here but the absence of any may be a downside as some debt can be very useful.

If the news is good then missing a day or two is OK

Ecomike

04/16/15 5:21 PM

#36546 RE: tykundegex #36538

What makes you think the MVTG "science" is not validated? Sounds like you have not researched the MVTG public info yet on the patents issued that validate the science done at UBC University by the worlds top electrochemical engineers. All the validation data is listed, test data in over 100 pages in the MVTG ERC and MRFC reactor and fuel cell patents which are now issued patents in 6 countries. That is very transparent.

Even Alstom-GE recognized this which is why they partnered with MVTG late in 2013 and are now funding the MVTG-Alstom-GE partnership R&D work.