Replies to post #15488 on Lightwave Logic Inc (LWLG)

[gatesoft55]

KCC,

Very informative post. Thank you!

I don't understand why Intel would jerk LWLG around when LWLG potentially has the solution to many of Intel's near-term and long-term problems? Does Intel have the ability to see the big picture?

And why didn't Tom call for a special vote in the 2 to 3 months following the last ASM? Why wait until May 2015?
Kind of risky.

GATES.

[coolair]

It would help ensure the passage of the authorized shares outstanding if Tom would get the device results out soon. I think everything hinges on the device results at this point. If the results are released the day of the meeting, there might be a question of if the increase in authorized shares will pass. The buying and voting yes enthusiasm has been muted by all the delays and partnership failures (no agreement with money = failure). As we approach the shareholder meeting with no data on the devices, this just becomes a gamble. I would sure hope after two delays, TZ would sand-bag the final deadline. I just counldn't imagine him missing deadlines like this in his previous position. Hate to even talk about it, but the management is "on the clock" after two delays and then turning around and setting a relatively short deadline. If the reason for the early meeting is to announce the results, great!! I can't imagine the meeting without the results. Everybody would be !@#$#@!. Sorry, Brass Tacks time.

[DLucky6636]

I am not sure we can say LSS jerked us around. The company has basically admitted the material was not good enough. That is the reason we had to mix it with Corning's.

it’s no secret that Intel was the LSS and jerked us around

What what you said, I don't quite understand why the management is not saying an extra word to encourage shareholders to vote for the increase. Trying to dare us to vote no? Not a good way to build trust between shareholders and management. I will probably end up voting for the increase simply because of walterc's effort. I can't go against a fellow shareholder who is working so hard. Otherwise, I would have voted no.

Wouldn’t be surprised if we don’t get those shares authorized though. Tom should have learned from last year's mistake...There are some large shareholders (collectively own well over 5%) who are demanding transparency.