Replies to post #47371 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[rafunrafun]

Can't believe you're posting this - the judge should look stuff up on the internet???? Tell us, should he read Seeking Alpha or the Fool or maybe AMRN message board? And after he reads that on the INTERNET, should he mark this as exhibits?

[mrmainstreet]

The judge only looks at evidence admitted at court. This is not an investigation outside the bounds of the proceedings. You seem to think this is Matlock. IMO the Judge will rule based on the issues at hand (e.g. the actual case between plaintiff v. defendant) and nothing else.

[HDGabor]

bio-

To consider the SPA issue the Judge has to know the facts. Could you cite an exact, factual statement form FDA (or from Amarin) re what was the exact reason to rescind the SPA?

Not a theory, a fact.

Acc. to my best knowledge the "closest" statement is (9/16 CC):
"FDA expressed to us that the accumulation of the scientific information that led FDA to conclude that HDL cholesterol could not be used as a surrogate end point for cardiovascular risk reduction occurred in the same timeframe as its decision to rescind the ANCHOR SPA agreement."

It is indicative, but not factual. So let's go find a definite statement.