You are saying that the SPA was based on FDA's assumption that lowering trigs lowers CVD, correct? And the reason SPA was rescinded is because that assumption proved incorrect via AIM HIGH and ACCORD LIPID STUDY?
"The SPA wasn't rescinded due to any new substantial evidence (occurring after the start of ANCHOR)"...Your words.
HD. You better go back and read the SPA agreement and let me translate it for you..It says the SPA can only be terminated on "new" substantial evidence, not on some other evidence you want to throw in..
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
