ANSWERING TRUM, sorry I type in CAPS because of eyesight (not shouting)
So why would a scrubby penny subber:'
-Bloat out it's O/S, and not have ANY business structure (nothing real) to show for it?
SOME PEOPLE ARE AFRAID OF LARGE (BLOATED) NUMBERS (NOT SURE WHAT THAT'S CALLED... YOU MIGHT KNOW). CAN'T HELP YOU THERE. THE 200:1 SPLIT WAS PINO'S DOING SO WE WOULD BE 'NOTICED ON THE OTC VOLUME PAGES' (A REVERSE SPLIT OF EVEN 1:3 WOULD HAVE PUT US ON 'PAGE 7', INSTEAD OF 'PAGE 3' TODAY. DAYS WHEN WE TRADE OVER 100M, WE END UP ON PAGE 1. WE WANT TO BE NOTICED TO INCREASE OUR SHARE BASE. SOMETHING PUBLIC COMPANIES LIKE TO DO.
- Why make deals for common shares at UNDER .0001?
YOU KEEP SAYING THEY DID THAT, YET YOU HAVE NEVER SHOWN ANY PROOF OTHER THAN 'YOUR OPINION'. SO NO SENSE EVEN COMMENTING FURTHER ON THAT ISSUE
- Why make deals for common shares AT .0001?
LOL. THEY HAVE TO GET 'FINANCING' SOMEHOW. THE FACT THAT THEY HAVE BEEN ABLE TO GET FINANCING AT THE 'GOING RATE OF SHARES (.0001) SPEAKS VOLUMES FOR WHAT THE FINANCIERS FEEL ABOUT 'MAKING A PROFIT'....IT'S SOMETHING FINANCIERS LIKE TO DO ' NOT BY 'DUMPING', AS YOU CLAIM AT .0001 AND UNDER).
GOOD QUESTION, ALLOWED ME TO EXPLAIN THE 'INCREASING SHARES FOR FINANCING AT .0001'. SHARES "BLOATED OUT" (trum's phrase) FOR FINANCING SINCE 2007 TOTALS 1,170,919,311===#117,091.00
- Why were insiders caught converting BILLIONS of shares recently at .0001 to commons from preferred?
LOL. CAUGHT??? YOU MAKE IT SOUND LIKE THEY DID IT UNDERHANDEDLY. I GRANT THAT THEY DIDN'T ASK 'YOUR PERMISSION (PROBABLY DIDN'T THINK THEY HAD TO). THOSE PREFERRED SHARES WERE THE 'CONVERTIBLE KIND'. A BETTER QUESTION WOULD HAVE BEEN 'WHY CONVERT AT THAT TIME' (SUMMER 2011). IF YOU'D READ THE N/Rs YOU WOULD HAVE 'REALIZED' THEY WERE GETTING READ FOR PRODUCTION, SO WHY SHOULDN'T THOSE WHO WERE FINANCING THE COMPANY BE ABLE TO 'TAKE PART IN THE 'UPCOMING SHORT SQUEEZE PRODUCTION RUN'. THE 'CHILL' DELAYED THAT, PUTTING 'PRODUCTION ON ICE'.
- Why lie in their PRs?
BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT INTO PRODUCTION YET, IT'S EASY TO 'SAY THEY LIED', BUT IT'S JUST DELAYED. DON'T CARE WHAT YOU CALL IT.
- Why pay stock touts Thousands of $$$ to hype off .0001 shares, while there is no product.
YOU CLAIM TO KNOW A LOT ABOUT HOW SCAMS WORK, BUT DO YOU REALIZE 'LEGIT' STARTUP HAVE TO USE 'TOUTS' AS WELL, IN ORDER TO INCREASE THEIR SHARE BASE. NOT SURE IF YOU REALIZE THAT, BECAUSE YOU STATE IT AS IF IT'S A 'BAD THING'. THEY'VE USED 2 COMPANIES. DO YOU REMEMBER WHEN?? NOV 2011 and MARCH 2012 WHEN GEARING UP FOR PRODUCTION (PRIOR TO THE CHILL which was MID MARCH--they had already paid for second 'tout').
- Continue to desperately beg shareholders to buy more shares while insiders covert out? LOL
I TOO LAUGH AT YOU CLAIMING THAT, CONTINUE??? LOL, I THINK YOU ARE REFERREING TO THE 2008 INTRODUCTION REGARDING 'FLUSHAWAY'. THE ONLY REASON PEOPLE ARE 'REMINDED', IS BECOME POOP CONTINUES TO QUOTE IT. UNLESS YOU ARE CLAIMING 'POOP' WORKS FOR THE COMPANY (I DON'T), IT'S NOT THE COMPANY 'DESPERATELY BEGGING SH...." WHILE INSIDERS CONVERT OUT??? LOL REMEMBER THEY DID THAT 4 YEARS AGO. LOL
adanac you are starting to look like an insider trying to dump off with your shorty is going down posts....
DON'T RECALL USING THAT PHRASE, BUT I DO BELIEVE THEY WILL 'GET SQUEEZED'. DO I HAVE TO BE AN INSIDER TO SAY THAT??? LOL
It makes me wonder why you stuck with this after getting played by CES and losing any investment you had in it there, or why you make false claims of pyct having product in some sketchy South African web site?
I'LL LET YOU KEEP WONDERING. AFTER I 'SELL', I'LL PM YOU, AND TELL YOU HOW MUCH I MADE. IT WILL BE MORE THAN 'A FLIPPER WOULD MAKE' LOL
Really? Is this joke of a stock worth all that?
LET ME ASK YOU, I'M HERE BECAUSE I'M A MEMBER OF THE 100M CLUB, AND WANT THE COMPANY TO SUCCEED. YOU'VE SPENT A LOT MORE TIME ON THIS BOARD THAN ME.
Really? Is this joke of a stock worth all that?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
