InvestorsHub Logo

Jack30

04/02/15 10:28 AM

#24639 RE: xlr-v #24638

WDAS owned 3 companies before and now 6 companies. It did not own PowerClouds. It was getting flat license fee from each PowerCloud. Now it is still getting the flat license fees from PowerClouds, however they also own the power plants in Romania and upcoming Japan. So, they will get any profit from these power plants for next 20 years. Also, if these 3 companies do installlations for PowerClouds, WDAS will collect any profit for installation works.

my2Mustangs

04/02/15 5:34 PM

#24653 RE: xlr-v #24638

It started out as claiming "revenues" for WDAS through licensing(smoke and mirrors) on the panels or some other such BS. Then Fabio sold that WDAS "subsidiary" to himself through another of his private companies. Then along came HVNB(now wmrt)to supposedly sell the computers, but why not sell them through WDAS.
PR promotional fodder is all they release.

The more times that company names are promoted investors start believing as you did. That's still going on.

Even the stuff about Solar Parc Moldoveni. Hype says that that's the "company" that has the Bucharest power stations. Not true.
Look around on the powerclouds.com site and investors can find a company by the name of Parc Solar Moldoveni. Name mistake by Roberto or was it/is it intentional for the promotional fodder?

GL and be careful, this shell is and has been a share selling scheme for more than 4 years, passed from "new CEO" promotion to another with "acquisitions" and "RMs" and any other promotional fodder that anybody can come up with.