InvestorsHub Logo

mymoneybgone

03/30/15 11:02 AM

#241437 RE: brant_point #241436

Huh...thats kind of the same reaction many of us got from those on the boards when stuff coming from sks did not add up...when we asked if Credant and others of their ilk were a threat to wave...you know. ....noise and distraction as it was called. Or agenda.

aleajactaest

03/30/15 11:21 AM

#241438 RE: brant_point #241436

one of these days, i expect someone to come over here and thank those of us who gave decent advice when all around us, folks were saying otherwise.

but until then, i assume optimists will assume themselves virtuous and will continue to disparage simple analysis.

i'll look forward to you producing the posts in which i say what you think i have said. timewise it usually works the other way around.

someone comes across from another board, declares an inviolable truth, i and a few other folks argue otherwise, then we see what happens. it's not hindsight. it's suggesting how things actually work and considering likely outcomes. eg when someone says that because a standard is being introduced glory is imminent, i will say that we have seen many standards come and go and not to create expectations.

i look back on my track record without many regrets.

warning folks not to follow the simplistic siren songs wasn't a bad thing to do. i have opposed those with the most ironclad certainties because it was the right course to take. i don't suppose i am wiser than providence.