BBANBOB/// According to Jolley’s counsel, the FDIC refused to produce the document unless all parties to the litigation signed a confidentiality agreement. On November 9, 2011, six days before the motion was to be heard, Jolley requested that counsel for Chase sign a confidentiality agreement. She refused to do so. On or about November 14, 2011, Jolley filed an ex parte application seeking to continue the motion, to keep discovery open, and to continue the trial date so that further efforts could be made to obtain the longer agreement.”
What would be the purpose of covering up a Purchase Agreement? Unassigned mortgage loan records, maybe? Maybe all of the unassigned mortgage loans allegedly sold to the trusts are noted in the “sealed” records… Oh, what a wicked web we weave – when first we practice to deceive.
Luckily, for Jolley the court recognized the necessity to view the 118-page Purchase Agreement. Maybe that’s because WaMu was notorious for offering the same loans in multiple trusts. Just a random survey of WaMu 2006-2007 trusts [CLICK HERE FOR FULL REPORT] turned up over 500 loans in 2 or more trusts. Matt Taibbi was just scratching the surface on what the SEC wasn’t on top of! [Click here for Madoff and the “Aggressively Clueless” SEC].
Wouldn’t you call fabricated assignments and loans assigned to multiple trusts dancing on the fringe of securities fraud? Hello, SEC????
-----------
You know In the very begining I cried for the heads of those that signed those SEC DOCs hehehe I'm so very tired as you know of reading old SEC CO. docks ;-)
Hmmmm? PEACE-Ts
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
