InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,064.20
(
0.91%
)
US TECH 100
17,169.20
(
1.83%
)
Dow Jones
38,225.66
(
0.85%
)
Brent Oil
83.63
(
0.11%
)
Bitcoin
59,219.25
(
1.69%
)

Replies to post #15217 on Lightwave Logic Inc (LWLG)

Replies to #15217 on Lightwave Logic Inc (LWLG)

gatesoft55

03/25/15 11:24 AM

#15218 RE: gatesoft55 #15217

Remember when LWLG decided to completely focus on the LSS. We all assumed the LSS was Intel. Why Intel? Well back in January 2011 during an investor presentation Phil Smith said that Intel controlled 85% of the chip market and AMD 15%. Phil said these were LWLG's target markets.

Move forward to 2014 and Tom Zelibor states the "we are going to beat Intel". What happened to that relationship? That is one of the many reasons we have so many unanswered questions.

I just remembered that in Phil Smith's 2011 presentation he stated that LWLG was working with Lockheed Martin. And then over a year later, Tom Zelibor tell us that LWLG has decided to terminate its relationship with Lockheed Martin because Lockheed kept moving the goalposts.


GATES.

fullthrottle

03/25/15 11:25 AM

#15219 RE: gatesoft55 #15217

Touché Gates. There are definitely viable arguments for both sides of this topic.

I just feel that you can't invest in a stock like this and expect the same type of regular news as say, an existing company with old products and history of revenue that is working on a new product in an already existing market.

Our technology could and hopefully will be the first of its kind to CHANGE a WHOLE market, industry...way of life even.

So for me, it's primarily the fact this is new and no one has done it before. Hence, we shouldn't be expecting the same type of updates. Nor should anyone expect a "get rich quick" and "make it happen now" mentality.

Most of us have been here a long time so we know it's not quick, but you're here for a reason. You believe. Stay strong!

prototype_101

03/25/15 12:06 PM

#15221 RE: gatesoft55 #15217

Gates, all of your questions could and should be topics of a quarterly review for investors, some of the details of the science developments may need to remain hidden, but the business surrounding the science certainly could be openly reviewed quarterly for investors, and in addition, some of the science could be updated for investors as well, just not at revealing levels interfering with existing NDA's, more cursory level for investors