InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

PGA3

03/25/15 11:33 AM

#294224 RE: Dax1 #294213

Sounds right to me.. They enacted it without congress. Now they want to use congress as their excuse.
icon url

Mathan22

03/25/15 12:02 PM

#294228 RE: Dax1 #294213

Watt in his testimony even uses logic when he states that he can unsuspend payments to affordable housing. What can't he undo the third amendment? It's just more schizophrenic approaches to doing what they want when it benefits them and passing the buck when it doesn't.
icon url

Dollars1

03/25/15 12:09 PM

#294230 RE: Dax1 #294213

The whole thing is illegal anyway. There is a part that says the purchaser (Treasury) may rescind under certain circumstances. I haven't found the same wording in the text for the seller. So, as I understand Treasury can do it. We need to stay focused on Lew and the Treasury and make sure they answer the questions. Is he saying he is required to have congressional approval to end the sweep? Where does it say that Lew? Or is he saying he "needs" it for political or cya reasons. He is very good at evading any question he doesn't want to answer. We need to be specific. Toomey had some great specific questions. IMO