Replies to post #188686 on Biotech Values

[ghmm]

Thanks for your input. With the overly lenient way you treat some of the rare rude posters on your board I certainly wouldn't expect you to be a "Harvey Hater". I view him as a strong science leader running a company that (At the current time at least) would do better with someone more financially oriented. For what its worth of the Biotech's I've owned if I would group CEO's in one of three categories (Doctors, MBA's or Lawyers) I've actually had some of the best success with companies run by Lawyers (I'm sure zipjet will like hearing that :-)).

[ilpapa]

would do better with someone else at the helm, and I suspect I'm not alone in that view.

You certainly aren't as you know from the ARIA board, but the candidate that has presented it self is Sarissa. Whether it was bad decisioning or whatever, the company has gone from the teens when they took over to 3 today even with an approved obesity drug - with some hair, admittedly.

I suppose it's needless to add that I owned some and lost money.

[JJM760]

Even after finding out that he was holding his "pounding the table" tour while the FDA discussions were ongoing? I find it hard for anyone to defend Berger or not be a "Harv hater".

Now we find there's a 483 for failure to follow protocol on follow up procedures???

He needs to go. And the faster the better.