InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Rkmatters

03/15/15 11:43 PM

#30785 RE: Pyrrhonian #30783

Immunotherapy needs its own criteria for response measurement as it typical enlarges tumors before it collapses it. And won't they be able to use other accepted measurements, such as tumor cells within the tumor itself and disease stabilization?
icon url

Ready4bluesky

03/16/15 12:24 AM

#30786 RE: Pyrrhonian #30783

I'm preparing to buy more short term calls. A lot more. I'll sell you some puts too. As many as you want to buy ;)
icon url

Dan88

03/16/15 8:37 AM

#30802 RE: Pyrrhonian #30783

Man, you have degraded yourself so low. For what you said to be true, both of the following have to be true:

You are genius;
Linda Powers is baby monkey who only know how to eat a banana.

icon url

Dan88

03/16/15 8:39 AM

#30803 RE: Pyrrhonian #30783

"I'd offer you advice, but I just don't care about your money, unless you give me money to care about your money. I might even be tricking you with the above post..."

Man, I also am worry about your clients' money. They will part in due time!
icon url

Steppenwolf_Speaks

03/16/15 11:02 AM

#30830 RE: Pyrrhonian #30783

So, if NWBO isn't seeing any partial responses in the initial results, why would they be planning a phase II?

And wouldn't at least the guy from national geographic have to have been partial response in order for inoperable tumors to become operable and removed?

Seriously, self-interest being oozed from these posts are so obvious.