InvestorsHub Logo

jetow

03/04/15 8:24 PM

#89374 RE: igotthemojo #89373

I disagree mojo. Lots of possibilities could be necessary to be disclosed in an S-1 in regard to Vietnam. So forward!

es1

03/05/15 12:11 PM

#89392 RE: igotthemojo #89373

you are wrong if you think anything vietnam related is required for the s-1...it is not...



So if shares from the S1 are going to be given for the purchase of a silk farm that has nothing to do with the s1?

Complete crap

so yea, hes stalling, hoping for good news on vietnam...hes waiting to hear one way or the other...



No not stalling... but you were correct there at the end. He is WAITING.

If he was not waiting because there was no viet nam deal THEN he would be stalling while trying to figure out what to do.

If he is stalling he has control over the next step and is choosing not to take it.

If he is waiting the next step s not in his control and so he could do nothing about the delay.

Use of the word is as simple as trying to point in a direction.

Stalling....bad
Waiting.... not bad.

We have to always point to bad right?
So we use the word "stalling" so that it is a bad thing he is doing intentionally to the shareholders.

After all you and all the shareholders are WAITING right? Or would you say you are stalling?

If Kim is waiting then he is in the same boat as all of us. That isnt a bad thing..... cant point at that.

So lets just agree to use "stalling" in place of "waiting".

After all stalling is something Kim has control over and waiting isnt