Replies to post #64260 on Liquidmetal Technologies Inc (LQMT)

[Spartan]

That's a very interesting theory. If only you had some proof. I wish you had some proof.

I used to work for McDonnell Douglas many years ago and I worked with some aluminum alloys that were surprisingly strong, hard, and lightweight. Apple might be using aircraft aluminum.

[longinus]

Agreed. I've been saying this since September, and I'm surprised that this has not been a more popular topic of discussion here. (EDIT: To clarify, I've insisted that the Au alloy must be amorphous. I'm not certain about the "aluminum" and "steel" casings.)

The $10 billion question is: what is our potential for exposure from Apple's use of our IP, and is LQMT management savvy enough to take full advantage—in spite of any non-disclosure restrictions that may be put in place by Apple?

oh but they are already using it,

How else do you think Apple was able to make the AppleWatch available in 3 alloys that are all stronger/harder than other aluminium/stainless/gold alloys?

It can only be possible if Apple made the watch from amorphous alloys,
for example; the aluminium AppleWatch is 60% stronger than other aluminium .... but the iPhone 6 does not use this stronger aluminium because the iPhone is milled while the Watch in molded.

If not amorphous then how else did Apple manage to make all 3 metals alloys stronger/harder?

Also Apple has never ever released a device in 3 different metal alloys, but One mold can be injected with different alloys so the one device can be available in several different case materials.

You can expect the yet to be released ApplePen/Stylus, to also be available in several bmg alloys.
18kt gold pen anyone :)

[Watts Watt]

Have you ever recanted this claim? It is fairly egregious.
What have you found about concerning the real content of the metals in these watches. You were so certain. How'd that work out for you?