ORA123, no support at all...
...that's OK. Like all aspects of the various theories, not link, no support or erroneous statements.
Also, I'm not asking "US SHAREHOLDERS," I'm asking you. You are the one that indicated that Susman "had them" based on "Susman's appeal of the golden parachutes."
Yet, there is no SUSMAN appeal, is there? Susman not involved at all, fact?
Such assertions with no support or found to be incorrect are amusing indeed.
Rosen (Weil) represents the WMILT on such. Soooooooooooooo, what does that make of the Susman pulling all the strings ongoing lurch?