InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,344.16
(
0.47%
)
US TECH 100
18,024.00
(
0.56%
)
Dow Jones
39,497.54
(
0.13%
)
Brent Oil
79.49
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
60,883.56
(
0.01%
)

Replies to post #27505 on IJJ Corp (IJJP)

Replies to #27505 on IJJ Corp (IJJP)
icon url

stervc

02/04/15 2:28 AM

#27527 RE: Huggy Bear #27505

malc stone, with this thought...

He did send me something. Right now I'm running on fumes and I just don't feel like dedicating the time towards organizing some thoughts. Actually, I don't feel like putting the pictures page by page into the proper format to post with what he sent me (LOL). Heck, there got to be an easier way.

Please understand, I'm not trying to change how you feel about IJJP. I already understand that we won't be able to change how each other feel regardless. I'm just a little different. If my dog has fleas, I'm not going to believe that I should get rid of it. I think it's good to get some flea powder or something to treat the flea problem in order to keep the dog.

You seem to be of mind that if your dog has fleas, you would just get rid of the dog. I respect how you feel. I just don't agree with how you feel. As I always like to say… It’s ok to “agree” to “disagree” on matters.

v/r
Sterling
icon url

stervc

02/05/15 3:30 AM

#27764 RE: Huggy Bear #27505

SEC Coordination Confirmation to Move Forward…

Like I previously stated, the lawyer Randall (Randy) S. Goulding did send me the confirmation of him coordinating with the SEC before he had gotten court approval for moving forward with this Marijuana deal that IJJP announced being a part of with a consortium of other companies/stocks (HALB, TWDL, ENTI, CWIR, GEAR) to be part of an Income Sharing Program from both the Michigan Plant Technologies (MPT) and the World of Marihuana Productions Ltd. (WOM) as PR-ed below:
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=64865110

Since actually requesting a ”no-action review” is ”not” a mandatory requirement, I think that this confirmed coordination below with the SEC by the lawyer is good enough in my opinion to justify why he felt comfortable to move forward with organizing and securing this deal. The lawyer (Randy Goulding) sent me as indicated below a SEC Corporation Finance Request for Interpretive Advice and a Memorandum of Discussion with SEC that confirms that this SEC coordination had taken place on August 25, 2014. Again, this coordination with the SEC was well before him being granted court approval to move forward with the program. See below:



Mr. Goulding’s SEC Corporation Finance Request for Interpretive Advice













Mr. Goulding’s Memorandum of Discussion with SEC







v/r
Sterling