Replies to post #19648 on Tauriga Sciences Inc (fka TAUG)

[$hrimp2Whale$]

Why were you buying shares then, sir? With all due respect, if the company wasn't doing "so well", then why did you purchase shares at a much higher price? What was revenue when you bought in? Simple questions that I mean no harm by. I'm just really confused by your statements. Don't take it as I'm trying to poke you in the eye or tell you your decision making is wrong - I'm simply confused why you bought shares of a company with no revenue and now all of a sudden the moment the company has revenue eon the books - NOW you're immediate concerns are 'revenue not good enough'? What about when it was non-existent and you were seemingly optimistic, what happened?

Call me ludicrous, but I do not understand your reasoning and that's the only reason I continue this interaction - I'm genuinely trying to understand.

[thehornet]

Johnny, this is the wrong argument. With regard to the "dying" entity, if Investors suddenly pulled the plug on funding, then this would be an issue of marginal utility where $1 dollar of investment renders as useless as $0.

However, with regard to growth, any number larger than a previous one ought to be viewed as a positive. So far, the team has demonstrated the ability to secure funding (sometimes through dilutive measures), but your concerns don't seem to add up. I get it, you're confident you will make money in the long run, but for now, I don't see why it's such a hard thing for you to accept progress...

[TJG]

Still missing the real point here IMO