Gnawkz, DCVax-Direct may receive AA, with either PhI or PhII data, before DCVax-L gets to a PDUFA date. That is one of the imports of my previous post on the topic today.
Given that it would likely be the case that DCVax-Direct would have a larger label (larger market available) than DCVax-L at any given point in time due to i) a much more rapid protocol for label expansion trials, and ii) initial label in cancers with larger markets, if the unlikely outcome of DCVax-L failure and DCVax-Direct success occurs, NW (IMO) would still be immensely successful.