Replies to post #53209 on International Consolidated Companies Inc (INCC)

[stringofpearls]

that TWEETY-was-not-"patent"-specific….INCC-fooled-again

given the 3,4 scenarios that INCC has CURRENTLY and "URGENTLY" going on, and the attorneys needed for these "purported" issues……….e.g. CHILL,, LICENSE, PATENT,,, LOI's……….how can ANYONE believe that the TWEET had to do with ANY attorney in specific

FLIP this and stop the "INCC is solid where they stand" rationalizations……..this is a PENNY FLIP

if INCC's TWEETY said "patent attorney" then they have credible week delay…INCC didn't tweet that, and it means that INCC knows the difference………

Currently with what is REALLY known about INCC……..NOT a good stock operator to be involved with

[ANTman2015]

AXE, where did you find that Tweet?? its not on Twitter,

[rawman]

Patent Attorney's Father Passed Away - it was tweeted about

Really? I'd go with Uccello will not or, probably more to the point, cannot pay the attorney fees and/or accountant fees! And these guys are not interested in receiving restricted stock in lieu of cash! Dah! The best evidence supporting this notion is the COMPLETE LACK OF ANY REGULATORY FILINGS, INCLUDING "REAL" FINANCIALS AND/OR FILED SEC FORM 8-K's, WHICH "REAL" COMPANIES USE TO INFORM INVESTORS OF MATERIAL EVENTS! An example would be to file an 8-K to report something like the details of a $3mm cash infusion! LOL!