This reeks, why would the company's attorney say $500k was conservative then then they back off to $200k? Makes no sense, especially in light of historic sales in the $500K neighborhood. He isn't supposed to report non public information so that's another reason I think it's a lie.
Any analysts that use ratings from pre ch 11 is a flat out fool and has no idea what he is writing about. The article imo is strictly put our buy the same person who is BUYING 10 to 50 thousand $$$ chunks of shares at a crack. I'm not counting but it's been two weeks of that now and it continues to happen. Coincidence?